Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

Social Media Wariness

 

I like social media. I've made good friendships with people I would otherwise never meet. I've strengthened relationships with people I never get to see. (And yes, I've destroyed at least one perfectly beautiful friendship.) Yet with the advent of Google+, I'm feeling like stepping back. I'm not eschewing social connections; I like the connections. I'm bothered by the wholesale commoditization of our lives and interests that takes place behind the scenes.

At some level we're all aware that our online lives are tracked, analyzed, evaluated, pigeon-holed, and above all: marketed-to. In many cases, we give up a lot of the rights to our own moments (think, photographs) simply by clicking I Agree on some byzantine Terms of Service; terms which might be best summarized as "good luck suing us."

Even more than those real concerns—tenuous that they may be at the moment—I'm not really interested in giving Facebook a way to monetize my life simply because I value the social connections it facilitates. We have all seen then the ads. Pick any company's advertising and it's likely to say "LIKE us on Facebook!" I'm sure Facebook loves the free advertising. It strikes me as odd that so many companies are willing to make Facebook the cornerstone of their marketing and customer outreach efforts. It feels like a foolish dilution of a brand to say "Go to facebook.com/companyx" instead of saying "visit us at companyx.com". (.com namespace concerns notwithstanding.)

Google is much the same problem. I've long been creeped-out by the "relevant" advertising in my "free" gmail account. Don't get me wrong, I'm not ready to abandon gmail. There was a time when we paid for email—I still do, in the form of custom domains—and while we gave up the burden of cost in exchange for our marketing information, I wonder if that wasn't a fool's bargain. Interestingly, twitter feels like the least egregious offender in social media so far. I think that's only because they don't know how to break it in a way that will make revenue without driving off the userbase. My instincts say it might be only a matter of time until that changes.

The bottom line is, I want to disintermediate huge corporations from those relationships that I choose to maintain. Which is to say, I don't want some company to make a buck off me simply because I want to say connected with someone. I realize that it's naive to want something like that. Think about it. The only way I can communicate with you for free is to talk to you in person. Given the relative costs and the might of our technological progress, that's pretty sad. The flipside is that the cost has never been lower to communicate around the world in an instant.

Based on what I've said here, I feel like I'm close to making a decision about how I communicate. If you want to reach me, my preferences are, in order:

  1. In Person
  2. Text/Twitter (608-729-4492 or @chrisash)
  3. Email (@chrisash.com)
  4. Voice (608-729-4492) or HeyTell works great.
  5. Everything else.

Where does Facebook and Google+ fit in there? Frankly, I'm not sure they do.

 

 

Reading list for May 12, 2011

Here are some interesting and thought-provoking stories for today. They're presented in ascending order of length and importance. Funny how that works.

SCIENCE // They claim there ought to be things in our universe that pre-date the Big Bang.

POLITICS // Paul Krugman, on what passes for adult conversation in Washington, D.C. It makes me wonder what it would take to elect people who would take their responsibilities seriously.

MOVIES // An interesting look at making the movie “Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter”. The book was quite fun.

SPORTS (and also politics) // Why an NFL-less season would be good for America

FRIENDSHIP // “If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country.” A long and important treatise on the modern state of Friendship in the age of Facebook. Give yourself some time to read and digest it. I would love to discuss this with people, because while I agree with much of it, there several ideas I find disagreeable.

Finding time to read is a challenge. Even when I make it a priority I find it difficult to carve out enough time. If you feel the same way, I can't overemphasize the usefulness of Instapaper, for reading web-based materials either online or on mobile devices.

Comment Disabler

When you spend a lot of time reading on the internet, you forget to ignore comments on articles. I do, at least. What this means is that sometimes you run into comments that are really hilarious (while still being offensive.) Like this one.

20100530-mqt6g2t2mubugctn74b1myf6kp.jpg

So what I need is a couple of developers who have experience with plug-in design. Hell, if we have to use kickstarter to get this project moving, I'll do it. What project, you ask? Good question.

I want a browser plug-in that dynamically replaces all comments, discussion, feedback, and forums on any web page with a big red box that says something like "YOU DON'T WANT TO READ COMMENTS, REMEMBER?" and then a little button that says "Read them anyway"

This is a plug-in I would pay good money to use. I would even pay a monthly subscription, in perpetuity, to have this feature.